Search for: All records

Abstract. The high-latitude atmosphere is a dynamic region with processes that respond to forcing from the Sun, magnetosphere, neutral atmosphere, andionosphere. Historically, the dominance of magnetosphere–ionosphere interactions has motivated upper atmospheric studies to use magneticcoordinates when examining magnetosphere–ionosphere–thermosphere coupling processes. However, there are significant differences between thedominant interactions within the polar cap, auroral oval, and equatorward of the auroral oval. Organising data relative to these boundaries hasbeen shown to improve climatological and statistical studies, but the process of doing so is complicated by the shifting nature of the auroral ovaland the difficulty in measuring its poleward and equatorward boundaries. This study presents a new set of open–closed magnetic field line boundaries (OCBs) obtained from Active Magnetosphere and Planetary ElectrodynamicsResponse Experiment (AMPERE) magnetic perturbation data. AMPERE observations of field-aligned currents (FACs) are used to determine the location ofthe boundary between the Region 1 (R1) and Region 2 (R2) FAC systems. This current boundary is thought to typically lie a few degrees equatorwardof the OCB, making it a good candidate for obtaining OCB locations. The AMPERE R1–R2 boundaries are compared to the Defense MeteorologicalSatellite Program Special Sensor J (DMSP SSJ) electron energy flux boundaries to test this hypothesis and determine the best estimate of thesystematic offset between the R1–R2 boundary and the OCB as a function of magnetic local time. These calibrated boundaries, as well as OCBsobtained from the Imager for Magnetopause-to-Aurora Global Exploration (IMAGE) observations, are validated using simultaneous observations of theconvection reversal boundary measured by DMSP. The validation shows that the OCBs from IMAGE and AMPERE may be used together in statisticalstudies, providing the basis of a long-term data set that can be used to separate observations originating inside and outside of the polar cap. 

Meso‐scale plasma convection and particle precipitation could be significant momentum and energy sources for the ionosphere‐thermosphere (I‐T) system. Following our previous work on the I‐T response to a typical midnight flow burst, flow bursts with different characteristics (lifetime, size, and speed) have been examined systematically with Global Ionosphere‐Thermosphere Model (GITM) simulations in this study. Differences between simulations with and without additional flow bursts are used to illustrate the impact of flow bursts on the I‐T system. The neutral density perturbation due to a flow burst increases with the lifetime, size, and flow speed of the flow burst. It was found that the neutral density perturbation is most sensitive to the size of a flow burst, increasing from ∼0.3% to ∼1.3% when the size changes from 80 to 200 km. A westward‐eastward asymmetry has been identified in neutral density, wind, and temperature perturbations, which may be due to the changing of the forcing location in geographic coordinates and the asymmetrical background state of the I‐T system. In addition to midnight flow bursts, simulations with flow bursts centered at noon, dawn, and dusk have also been carried out. A flow burst centered at noon (12.0 Local Time [LT], 73°N) produces the weakest perturbation, and a flow burst centered at dusk (18.0 LT, 71°N) produces the strongest. Single‐cell and two‐cell flow bursts induce very similar neutral density perturbation patterns.